<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consignment Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/2008/07/consignment-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/2008/07/consignment-question/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bankruptcy Type</title>
		<link>http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/2008/07/consignment-question/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Bankruptcy Type</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/?p=28#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I found your blog via Google while searching for bankruptcy type and your post regarding Consignment Question looks very interesting for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I found your blog via Google while searching for bankruptcy type and your post regarding Consignment Question looks very interesting for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/2008/07/consignment-question/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernsteinlaw.com/blog/?p=28#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Bob: I tend to agree since an Article 9 Consignment is deemed a PMSC, to perfect a consignment in the same type of inventory, the holder must give notice to all secured parties claiming a security interest in the same type inventory which would include consignment filings by definition. Also such notice protects both consignors by giving each an oportunity to develope a mewthod of verifying which goods are theirs. Have not seen any cases however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: I tend to agree since an Article 9 Consignment is deemed a PMSC, to perfect a consignment in the same type of inventory, the holder must give notice to all secured parties claiming a security interest in the same type inventory which would include consignment filings by definition. Also such notice protects both consignors by giving each an oportunity to develope a mewthod of verifying which goods are theirs. Have not seen any cases however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
